>In a message dated 98-02-22 14:36:33 EST, [log in to unmask] writes:
>
>Dear Bob,
>
>All your index proposal really constitutes is whining that somehow your
favorite >team is losing on the ice and you want to adjust how that should be
determined or >that you are frustrated because your school is having trouble
recruiting the hockey >players you want.
>
><< snipped >>
>
>By the way, the Jock U I graduated from with undergraduate and graduate
degrees >is the University of Chicago.  Few would accuse it of being Jock U
although as a D->3 school it has its athletic priorities in the right place.
They did teach us how to >analyze specious arguments there, however.
>
 
Dear Ken,
 
If the first sentence of  your post reflects what goes into forming your
conclusions, you should see whether they'll let you retake that course in
analysis of specious arguments.  I'm perfectly happy with my school does on
the ice, its program, and its recruiting, though I might be happier if they
won less.
 
Congratulations on graduating from the University of Chicago.  I certainly
wouldn't call it a jock school and all the people who did are surely dead by
now.  I even had quite a bit of respect for the school until I read your post.
What city is it in anyway?
 
Bob
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.