Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 18 Oct 1995 13:36:25 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Machnik <[log in to unmask]> writes:
Mike> [...]
Mike> It seems to me that most referees are predisposed towards being
Mike> lenient on the DQs - you've really got to earn it. I'd rather
Mike> have it be this way unless fighting becomes a major problem.
I completely agree and I don't think the new rule change will change
the way DQs are assessed. When I referee a game and a player throws a
weak punch, which is technically a fighting penalty, I'll hand out a
minor or double-minor for roughing. Of course if he drops his gloves
and comes up swinging, that is a different situation.
Mike> However, we do need to draw a distinction between fighting or
Mike> goon hockey, and good old-fashioned physical play ("Toe
Mike> Blake...Eddie Shore") along with intimidation. The latter does
Mike> indeed have a place in the game by the very nature of it. If
Mike> you don't believe me, watch any game.
As I said previously, I'm all for physical play. A good hard check
will still get the fans involved and intimidate opponents. I just
don't like to have the game delayed while two players duke it out on
the ice. I do enjoy watching a player deliver a great hip check --
which is extremely difficult to accomplish -- that leaves the other
sprawled out on the ice.
I realize that tough automatic sanctions may result in the officials
calling less fighting penalties and more double-minors. One of the
leagues I ref automatically suspends a player for 2 games for his
first and 1 year for his second game misconduct in a 12-month
period. Until this year, we were *required* to hand out a game
misconduct with *every* major penalty. The result was less majors
called.
I think that the new WCHA rules, however, will cut down on the brawls
on ice which will still be called as fighting majors. I believe that
this a good-thing(tm). I don't think it will drastically change the
face of hockey.
Pete Kester
[log in to unmask]
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|