---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 1994 16:28:59 -0500
From: Automatic digest processor <[log in to unmask]>
To: Recipients of HOCKEY-L indexes <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: HOCKEY-L Index - 4 Mar 1994 - Special issue
Index Date Size Poster and subject
----- ---- ---- ------------------
17004 03/04 10 From: "Robert S. Smith" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: CCHA standings
17005 03/04 31 From: John Haeussler <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: CCHA standings
17006 03/04 12 From: Brian Zive <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: NC$$ decision on Maine
17007 03/04 53 From: "G. M. Finniss" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: MSU 2, FSU 1 box (the Mike and Anson Show)
17008 03/04 43 From: larry latour <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Suggested Maine/HE Tourney Plan
17009 03/04 70 From: Keith Instone <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: CCHA play-off picture, 2-6 (update)
17010 03/04 15 From: Dave Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Boston area residents: Chance to see next year's
frosh
17011 03/04 17 From: Jayson Moy <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: RPI in HE?
17012 03/04 53 From: Ken Kretsch <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Miscllaneous Stuff
17013 03/04 41 From: Jayson Moy <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Albany media's biased?
17014 03/04 12 From: Greg Sorenson
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Miscllaneous Stuff
17015 03/04 30 From: Matthew Glaccum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Div I ACHA Tournament Action
17016 03/04 22 From: Keith Instone <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Which games are forfeits?
17017 03/04 74 From: Robert Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Maine must forfeit 21, NC$$ rules (Boston Globe
article)
17018 03/04 18 From: Nicholas Strangas <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Maine must forfeit 21, NC$$ rules (Boston Globe
article)
17019 03/04 16 From: "G. M. Finniss" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Miscellaneous Stuff
17020 03/04 8 From: Erik Biever <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Minnesota HS Hockey Tournament
17021 03/04 8 From: Joel Kitay <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Amonte Snubbed
17022 03/04 187 From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: The Most Recent Developments in Orono
17023 03/04 23 From: Greg Sorenson
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject: HE snubs
17024 03/04 69 From: Bill Fenwick <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Maine must forfeit 21, NC$$ rules (Boston Globe
article)
17025 03/03 10 From: Ryan Robbins <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Tardif reinstated
17026 03/04 8 From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Maine Athletic Flash
17027 03/04 54 From: "G. M. Finniss" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: MSU-Ferris, preview of tonight]
17028 03/04 63 From: Mike Machnik <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: HE revised standings if forfeits count
17029 03/04 38 From: John Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Suggested Maine/HE Tourney Plan
17030 03/04 20 From: "John R. Nash" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: that's all right...
17031 03/04 31 From: Brian Morris <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: RPI to HE?
17032 03/04 38 From: Bill Fenwick <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Maine forfeits and NC$$ tourney
17033 03/04 32 From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Maine must forfeit 21, NC$$ rules (Boston Globe
article)
17034 03/04 17 From: Bob Gilreath <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Maine forfeits and NC$$ tourney
17035 03/04 23 From: Greg Sorenson
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject: RPI to HE and ECAC tourn.
17036 03/04 87 From: Tony Biscardi <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Boston area residents: Chance to see next year's
frosh
17037 03/04 26 From: Mike Machnik <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Three cheers for the NCAA
17038 03/04 22 From: Tony Biscardi <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Which games are forfeits?
The sizes shown are the number of lines in the messages, not counting mail
headers. For your convenience, this message has been specially formatted to
make it easier to order the messages you are interested in. Just forward this
message back to LISTSERV@MAINE (or [log in to unmask]) and fill in the line
starting with "Print" (if there is not enough space, you can add more lines as
long as you type "Print" on each new line). Make sure to use the forward
command of your mail program, not the normal reply function. There is a lot
more the LISTSERV database functions can do for you - for instance, you can
select all the messages with a particular subject in a single command rather
than retyping all the index numbers. For more information, send an INFO
DATABASE command to LISTSERV (you could add it before the line that says
"Database search" the next time you order messages from the LISTSERV archive).
Another method which could be more convenient, depending on the mail program
you are using, is to reply to this message while including the original text,
just like when you are replying to a normal message and want to quote what your
correspondent said. Before sending the message, delete the lines corresponding
to the items you are not interested in, and make sure your reply is being sent
to "[log in to unmask]", NOT to "[log in to unmask]". Note that
this may not work with all mail programs; the first method is more reliable.
// JOB
Database search DD=Orders
//Orders DD *
Select * in HOCKEY-L.17004-17038
print 17009
print 17004
/*
// EOJ
|
