Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 20 Feb 1999 15:14:20 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Considering that Cornell has already been in one game with 200+ penalty
minutes (Union) and another with close to that (Princeton), one has to
wonder whether this game should be considered either
1) A rectifying of statistical anomalies so that Cornell, like any other
team averages a normal amount of penalties per game (an averaging ut so to
speak)
2) A clearly poorly refereed game since obviously Cornell doesn't play
penalty free or even limited penalty hockey.
or
3) A display of the clearly inconsistent style of the ECAC referees.
I'm inclined towards (3). Just thought I'd comment.
Larry
At 1:20 PM -0500 2/20/99, Mark J. Hill wrote:
>During Cornell's 4-1 win on Friday night there were only three penalties
>called, all on Brown. I think the topic of penalty free games has been
>brought up before, but I can't remember how often this happens. Are there
>many other games in which a team has escaped without any penalties?
>
>
>Mark
>SLU 96
>Let's Go SAINTS!!!!
>(Thanks to Sara for the signature template!)
>
>HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
>[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
Larry Weintraub '98,
Cornell University
Let's Go BIG RED!!!!!
Quote of the Semester:
"They wear their hearts on their sleeves here at Cornell...and also
their faces."
-- TV Announcers at the Cornell-Colgate game,
while the camera was in a close-up on my painted face.
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|