HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Frolik <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sat, 2 Jul 1994 12:44:43 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
Mike Machnik writes:
 
>had a stronger schedule and performed better against it
>proportionally, but that CC benefited from a weaker >conference
>schedule than some of its opponents (Minnesota) which >allowed it to
>capture the conference title.
 
I would like to know how CC had a weaker conference schedule than Minnesota.
Take out head to head games and they should have had the same strength of
schedule in the conference.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2