HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Dec 1999 18:14:33 -0700
Reply-To:
Subject:
From:
In-Reply-To:
<003901bf4da7$b10f2460$2e48ffd1@monorailpc>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Comments:
To: Michael Neal <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
At 06:41 PM 12/23/99 -0600, Michael Neal wrote:
>Why do they test for non-performance
>enhancement drugs like marijuana and cocaine?
 
Because it's all part of the same drug test. It's much more cost effective
to have a lab report results based on a standard list of
banned/controlled/illegal substances rather than have them test for only
specific portions. And as long as the reports reveal the existence of
illegal substances...
 
 
>This is also irrelevant to the point.  Taking steroids would be the choice
>of the athlete and he or she is the one that would face the consequences of
>their debilitating effects.  So, by the logic presented, why should the NCAA
>be banning them?  Are players any less adults on the subject of drugs than
>face shields?
 
This is a stupid argument. Please don't drag the list down this road.
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2