Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 4 Nov 1995 07:53:31 -0700 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Comments: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Sorry, but IMHO this number is irrelevant to COLLEGE hockey. We are
comparing apples and oranges.
Once again, we bring up the importance of interconference play. I laud
the HE and ECAC for doing lots of it. The CCHA for trying to do a bit,
and the WCHA, well, what can I say except that I would like to see some of
their teams play others than in their league.
If we had decent non-league game totals, then we might have a leg up on
which conference is best in an overall sense.
OTOH, what does it matter? All we recall are the champs .... and our
teams having a decent season,no?
Tony Buffa
RPI '64, hoping they win a game soon
============================
On Fri, 3 Nov 1995, Reed H Munson wrote:
> The only way to prove HE is the best league is to account for the number
> of players from that division that have gone onto the pros.
========================
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|