HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Fenwick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bill Fenwick <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Oct 1993 15:44:14 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
My turn to jump in... Rick writes:
 
>                                                  In addition, Mike indicated
>after Prep school, eligibility is intact if the student is under 20 years old.
>Did I miss something in the Tom Glavine discussion? I thought it was agreed he
>could go to college when he retired from baseball and have his hockey
>eligibility intact. Is this an inconsistency or are there two different sets
>of rules for the different situations?
 
There is an NC$$ rule (yes, another one :-) stating that a college hockey
player loses one year of eligibility for every year he participates in organ-
ized, non-collegiate hockey (i.e. junior leagues) after reaching the age of
20.  I'm not sure if this is across all sports or is hockey-specific, though
because of the prevalence of hockey junior leagues, I would guess it's the
latter.  Tom Glavine would thus have all his hockey eligibility (assuming
his "advanced" age was not a factor) because he didn't play hockey past the
age of 20.
--
Bill Fenwick                        |  Send your HOCKEY-L poll responses to:
Cornell '86 and probably '94        |  [log in to unmask]
LET'S GO RED!!
"This is a really sexy thing to do, according to the French, although you
 should keep in mind that these people also like to eat snails."
-- Dave Barry, on French kissing

ATOM RSS1 RSS2