Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 9 Mar 1998 09:51:51 -0700 |
Comments: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Estimated NCAA Division 1 Ice Hockey ratings percentage index
based on 697 games played through 03/08/98
Game scores for this calculation provided by www.uscollegehockey.com
Weight 35% 50% 15%
G W L T win% rank opp% rank opp-opp Total
1 Boston University 33 26- 5- 2 81.82 ( 1) 51.38 (14) 50.64 (21) 61.92
2 North Dakota 34 27- 6- 1 80.88 ( 2) 51.23 (16) 51.24 ( 4) 61.61
3 Michigan State 36 27- 5- 4 80.56 ( 3) 51.39 (13) 50.76 (15) 61.50
4 Michigan 36 26- 9- 1 73.61 ( 5) 51.19 (17) 51.05 ( 9) 59.01
5 New Hampshire 32 22- 9- 1 70.31 ( 7) 50.87 (22) 50.49 (24) 57.62
6 Boston College 34 21- 8- 5 69.12 ( 8) 50.52 (25) 51.24 ( 3) 57.14
7 Clarkson 29 19- 7- 3 70.69 ( 6) 49.82 (28) 48.91 (32) 56.99
8 Yale 29 22- 6- 1 77.59 ( 4) 44.17 (41) 48.24 (42) 56.48
9 Ohio State 34 21-11- 2 64.71 (10) 50.60 (24) 51.01 (11) 55.60
10 Colorado College 36 22-11- 3 65.28 ( 9) 48.81 (32) 50.67 (19) 54.85
11 Wisconsin 34 20-13- 1 60.29 (11) 51.40 (12) 51.70 ( 1) 54.56
12 St Cloud 32 17-13- 2 56.25 (15) 52.66 ( 5) 51.10 ( 6) 53.68
13 Miami 34 18-12- 4 58.82 (12) 49.64 (30) 51.29 ( 2) 53.10
14 Northeastern 34 18-13- 3 57.35 (14) 50.83 (23) 50.74 (17) 53.10
15 Northern Michigan 34 16-14- 4 52.94 (17) 51.37 (15) 50.94 (12) 51.86
16 Minnesota-Duluth 33 16-15- 2 51.52 (19) 52.38 ( 7) 50.85 (13) 51.85
17 Notre Dame 37 16-17- 4 48.65 (21) 52.41 ( 6) 51.01 (10) 50.88
18 Maine 29 12-13- 4 48.28 (24) 52.70 ( 4) 50.73 (18) 50.86
19 Rensselaer 31 16-11- 4 58.06 (13) 46.49 (37) 48.59 (36) 50.85
20 Lake Superior 34 15-15- 4 50.00 (20) 51.02 (20) 50.55 (22) 50.59
21 Minnesota 36 16-20- 0 44.44 (30) 54.80 ( 1) 50.81 (14) 50.57
22 Mass Lowell 32 14-15- 3 48.44 (23) 51.46 (11) 49.64 (27) 50.13
23 Providence 34 15-16- 3 48.53 (22) 50.33 (26) 49.89 (26) 49.64
24 Colgate 31 14-13- 4 51.61 (18) 48.35 (35) 48.81 (35) 49.56
25 Ferris State 36 15-18- 3 45.83 (29) 51.03 (19) 50.53 (23) 49.14
26 Princeton 27 11- 9- 7 53.70 (16) 46.11 (38) 48.56 (37) 49.13
27 Brown 28 12-14- 2 46.43 (27) 50.97 (21) 48.84 (33) 49.06
28 Harvard 29 11-16- 2 41.38 (32) 54.14 ( 2) 48.54 (38) 48.83
29 Cornell 28 12-14- 2 46.43 (27) 48.66 (33) 48.82 (34) 47.90
30 Michigan Tech 34 13-18- 3 42.65 (31) 50.11 (27) 51.11 ( 5) 47.65
31 Mankato State 28 12-13- 3 48.21 (25) 44.98 (40) 48.46 (39) 46.63
32 Denver 33 11-20- 2 36.36 (34) 52.28 ( 8) 50.25 (25) 46.40
33 Dartmouth 29 11-13- 5 46.55 (26) 43.80 (42) 48.96 (31) 45.54
34 Vermont 32 10-18- 4 37.50 (33) 48.44 (34) 49.16 (30) 44.72
35 St Lawrence 29 8-19- 2 31.03 (36) 52.83 ( 3) 48.44 (40) 44.55
36 Western Michigan 37 10-25- 2 29.73 (37) 51.74 ( 9) 50.75 (16) 43.89
37 Alaska-Fairbanks 32 8-20- 4 31.25 (35) 49.38 (31) 51.10 ( 7) 43.29
38 Merrimack 33 8-24- 1 25.76 (38) 51.12 (18) 49.35 (29) 41.98
39 Bowling Green 37 7-27- 3 22.97 (42) 51.61 (10) 50.66 (20) 41.44
40 Alaska-Anchorage 34 6-23- 5 25.00 (39) 49.67 (29) 51.10 ( 8) 41.25
41 Mass Amherst 31 5-23- 3 20.97 (43) 47.95 (36) 49.36 (28) 38.72
42 Union 30 5-21- 4 23.33 (41) 45.85 (39) 48.27 (41) 38.33
43 Air Force 12 3- 9- 0 25.00 (39) 37.47 (44) 46.28 (43) 34.43
44 Army 17 2-15- 0 11.76 (44) 43.29 (43) 46.00 (44) 32.66
Average 49.13 49.71 49.90 49.53
Standard Deviation 17.51 3.23 1.32 6.77
range 11.76 37.47 46.00
to 81.82 54.80 51.70
This information is freely available for personal use.
Copyright 1998 Charlie Shub.
Republication without permission is prohibited.
This calculation includes only teams eligible for the NCAA tournament.
Since Nebraska-Omaha and Niagara both fit the definition of
an Emerging Program, and the NCAA does not include emerging programs
in their calculations, their games are not included.
The total is calculated by the Rating Percentage Index method,
used as a tool by the NCAA in selecting teams for national
collegiate tournaments in several sports. Ratings are derived
by summing each team's winning percentage, the average winning
percentage of its opponents, and the average winning percentage
of its opponents' opponents, multiplied by the given weights.
Factors such as importance of game, margin of victory, or home
ice are not included in the calculations.
charlie shub University of Colorado at Colorado Springs
[log in to unmask] -or- [log in to unmask] -or- [log in to unmask]
(719) 262-3492 (fax) 262-3369 http://www.cs.uccs.edu/~cdash
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|