Lake Superior was 3-6-3 through 12 games last year and lost only 6 more games
all year (the last coming at the hands of the NCAA champs). So Wisconsin does
not have an impossible task ahead of it.  However, the Lakers were NOT
getting votes in polls at this time last year.  I believe that Eeyore's point
is that somebody's either goofing around or being a real "homer".
 
Scott Monaghan
Assistant Athletic Director
Lake Superior State University
[log in to unmask]
906-635-2601
 
On Mon, 27 Nov 1995, G. M. Finniss wrote:
 
> Eeyore wrote:
> > What kind of voter is giving a vote to Wisconsin?  I'm at least in the
> > neighberhood when I say that their record is something like 2-11-1.  Can
> > this person be stripped of their vote?
>
> Their record is 2-9-1, not 2-11-1 (they're 2-7-1 in conference, and their only
> two non-conference games were in the Showcase).  Needless to say, barring a
> major turn-around, Wisconsin won't be reappearing in the NC$$ Tournament.
>
> (Of course, last time I said something like this, it was about Lake Superior,
> which spawned the infamous "Finniss is WRONG" post from Charlie.  I've been
> WRONG for a year and RIGHT for a day.  Time to come full circle.  Maybe I
> just gave Wisconsin the kiss of life.)
>
> G. M. Finniss
> Michigan State University 7-2-0, 10-4-0
>
> Women's volleyball team (31-2) #2 seed in the Mountain Region of the NCAA
> tournament (top 3 seeds in that region are Hawaii, MSU and San Diego St. and
> it's the Mountain Region?  You figure it out), hosts winner of Houston-
> Brigham Young in second round of tournament on Saturday.
>
> Ferris State in the semis of the Division II tournament.  Good luck against
> North Alabama.
>
> HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
> [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
>
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.