HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"CHARLES F. O'BRIEN" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
CHARLES F. O'BRIEN
Date:
Sat, 5 Mar 1994 09:01:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
        While I understand and sympathize with those [M. Machnik,
C. Shub] who are urging a softer line on Maine, it seems to me that
Ploszek's actions in knowingly allowing a Maine team to play an
ineligible athlete calls for something more than a sanction on him
personally.  Remember when SMU got the "death penalty"?  That was
largely for things done by boosters.  In this case, it would appear
that we have a grievous offense by the #1 person in the Athletic
Program at Maine.  Surely there must be an institutional sanction as
well as a personal one.  I shudder to think of the consequences of
applying Mike Machnik's logic to some of the bandit football and
basketball programs of recent years.  Yes, this is a harsh penalty,
but it will be a long time before another national contender dresses
three ineligible players in less than two years -- in hockey, at least.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2