HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
David W Hatfield <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 Mar 1998 13:00:14 -0500
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
>Merrimack was behind 2-0 after one period, but tied it 2-2 in the second
>period. The Warriors then took a two-goal lead (not including a goal that
was
>disallowed because the referee ruled that it had been directed into the
goal
>by a high stick; the video replay was inconclusive) in the fourth period.
 
I didn't know they added an extrra period to these games  ;-)
 
>Drury scored to cut the lead to 4-3, but the Warriors hung tough. Then,
with
>about 1:20 remaining, BU called time out, and Parker pulled the goalie.
>Merrimack's Pyliotis (who joined the team at midseason) scored an
empty-net
>goal with 1:06 (approx.) remaining. Drury scored another goal with 13
seconds
>to go, which makes one wonder whether Jackie was premature in pulling the
>goalie.
 
Judgment call, IMHO.  I think the threshold for pulling the goalie is
usually ~1:30.  Anytime after that seems fair game to me.  Of course, it
all depends on where the play is at the time.  If they scored, Parker's
call would've looked like a good one.  Instead, MC scored on a misfired
pass by Poti near his own blue line.  Go figure...
 
 
Dave
UML'86
[log in to unmask]
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2