Watching the game on Tv and seeing RPI's third goal, does someone have a reason as to why it was not disallowed on two accounts??  First it was obviously put in by a player laying in the crease with something other than his stick (ie his hand). secondly the player was laying in the crease for several shots from 5-10 ft out in the slot.  Shouldnt that qualify as a crease violation as well??  The puck left the crease area at least twice before he pushed it in?  Is it an eirie coincidence that Cornell lost years LSSU game to a goal that would have been allowed by a reply judge and loses a goal this year on a goal that should have been disallowed by a replay judge.
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.