HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Robb Newman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Feb 1997 15:26:18 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Reply-To:
Robb Newman <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
>
> > Apparently, Vermont assistant coach Roger Grillo said following the game
> > there is an "unwritten rule" that coaches would not use this rule to
> > their advantage
>
 
Then why have the (written) rule - unless you can come up with a scenario that a
power play isn't an advantage?
 
I'll throw in my .02 now:
 
I believe that this "tactic" is actually a carefully thought out strategy on
Schafer's part.  He has decided that Cornell should play all the time with a
slight "disadvantage" (legal sticks) in order that they can gain a relatively
large advantage (extra power plays) when really needed.
 
Furthermore, I have no sympathy for UVM on this one.  I believe that this was
the fourth game that Schafer has used this rule in his two seasons at Cornell.
If the UVM coaches want to be mad at someone, it should be themselves for not
being alert.
 
Let's Go Red!
 
Robb Newman
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2