Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 19 Mar 1996 06:45:31 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Mar 1996, Mike Machnik wrote:
> The argument was that allowing Lowell to remain in Albany,
> especially when they rank high enough to belong there, could have done
> more to strengthen one program's fan base than almost any other
> decision that was made. That helps interest in college hockey to
> grow and is good for the sport.
> --- ---
There is a reason why most of us type in NC$$. This is an organization that
couldn't care less about fair competition or rewarding merit. Lowell got
shafted, and I agree with Mike that the NC$$, not the committee, is where
the responsibility lies. I'm glad that we hockey fans at least explore
the issues involved in this. It amazes me as a UConn basketball fan that
the issue of moving top teams out of their region is not even discussed
for hoops, the idea of moving teams is a nonfactor, of course attendance
issues are not the same for basketball.
Arthur Berman [log in to unmask]
GO BU!!! NATIONAL CHAMPIONS!!!
NAYIM FROM THE HALFWAY LINE!!!
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|