Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 26 Mar 2017 22:52:31 -0400 |
Content-Type: | MULTIPART/MIXED |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
You mean the goal that was scored as a result of a player jumping off
the bench when all four penalty killers were still on the other side
of the red line? The only problem with that replay was that the
officals couldn't assess a minor for too many men on the ice (and that
they didn't call it in real time).
John Whelan
Cornell '91
On Sun, 26 Mar 2017, Sebastian Bongiorno wrote:
> Still lurking around.
> I missed the beginning of the thread and don't know what goal you guys are
> talking about. I'm still trying to figure out the goal the called back
> yesterday against Cornell.
> Still a little in shock from today's game. Was really thinking we would make
> it to Chicago. Oh well can't complain about the rest of the year it was a
> pleasant surprise.
>
> Regards
> Bongi
> Go Hawks!!
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: UMass goal
> From: Carol White <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Sun, March 26, 2017 1:54 pm
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Missed that. BONJI! Are you still on here?
>
> Carol
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Tom <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Why wasn't the goal disallowed for a man in the crease? I
> obviously don't understand the rule correctly.
>
> Tom Rowe
> --
> ------------------------------
> I hate it when people use big words just to make
> themselves sound perspicacious.
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
|
|
|