HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Arthur C. Mintz" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Arthur C. Mintz
Date:
Wed, 14 Feb 1996 08:30:16 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
It is not entirely correct to call the ECAC's quarterfinal round playoff
format a "best-of-three" format. It is a best-of-two, with a one-game
tiebreaker. The addition of a single five-minute overtime period in games
one and two may increase the probability of a game ending with a winner and
a loser, but it does not change the basic nature of the series. The teams
play two games, winners get two points per win, losers get none, each team
gets one point for a tie game. The team that is ahead after two games wins
the series. If neither team is ahead, they play one game, to a clear
decision, to determine the winner of the series.
 
Sorry to get pedantic about this. If the ECAC wants a true best-of-three
series, each game has to be played until there is a winner and a loser.
 
 
----------
Arthur C. Mintz          [log in to unmask]          (607) 255-1487
Programmer / Analyst Specialist
Team Leader, Developer Support Team
Cornell Information Technologies / Information Resources
 
"Indecision may or may not be my problem." - Jimmy Buffett
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2