HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 May 2008 11:43:17 -0500
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Subject:
From:
Eric Burton <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed"
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
I think the Replay is one of the best ways and methods to make sure  
they get the right call as long as Randy Schmidt or Greg Shepherd  
aren't reviewing them.

Quoting "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>:

> I am not in favor of replays.  It just slows the game down too much.  If
> they do use it, they should set a time limit on how long it can take to
> make a decision.  I attend the Lewiston Maineiacs games and many times the
> replay decisions took way too much time.  I think one decision took more
> than 10 minutes to make.  The indecision on the part of the refs was
> unbelievable.  It only highlighted their incompetency which seemed to be a
> league problem this year.
>
> The other proposed changes make sense.  I would like to see them use the
> NHL system for overtimes.
>
> Mamie Anthoine Ney
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
> http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2