Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 31 Mar 1992 13:20:41 PST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>(2) The statistical analysis above implicitly ASSUMES that any one game
between
>the two teams is completely INDEPENDENT of another with the same probability of
>p=0.3. Clearly if one team gets blown out on the first night, it will have
>some effect on how they will play the following night, not only psychologically
>but also the Coach will most likely change the game plan. Thus, the 3 game
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>series can not be modeled as three independent random events.
More likely, if a team gets upset my a close score because they played
flat, bad bounce/ref, etc. (the scenario I thought was originally
proposed), the coach gives his team a post-game 'analysis' (aka: chews
their butts out) and they play a more motivated game in the next two.
I think the western 2 game series regular season format gives some
insight into 2/3rds of a best of 3 game format, if someone wanted data
to 'crunch'.
-John Hughes
[log in to unmask]
[So who do we "Eastern" hockey fans now root for? ...Michigan!]
|
|
|