Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:27:59 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Or maybe the game as it is played nowadays, especially involving the top, say 20 teams in the country, is pretty much of a crapshoot. In that case anything better than 50% is good in my book That makes me feel better for barely edging out a 6 month old. Next year I will have to enter my grandson :-)
Tony
On Apr 11, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Hampton, Nathan E. wrote:
> So, if we were grading our performance based on percentage (= our best/maximum):
> Contest our best maximum percentage
> 1 14 21 57%
> 2 70 118 59%
> 3 87 160 54%
> 4 10 14 71%
> 5 60 98 61%
> 6 77 140 55%
>
> From this I would conclude that we are "D" students of the game. Or just bad bracket pickers.
>
> Nathan
>
>
> On 4/11/11 4:04 PM, "Mark Lewin" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Thanks to all that entered. As always, if anyone has questions or wants to
> see how the points were derived, email me for further information.
>
> For your information, the Hannah K Lewin who finished in the top 10 in every
> contest is my granddaughter (age 6 months). I'd especially like to thank
> Tony Buffa who edged her out in 4 out of 6 contests and probably scarred her
> psyche for life. Way to go, Tony!!
>
> For those who suspect that I use inside information submitting my picks for
> my own advantage, this years contest should dispel those suspicions
> completely.
>
> If anyone has any suggestions for changes or improvements for next year,
> feel free to email me
|
|
|