Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 22 Mar 2002 22:22:44 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree, Mark. The SCSU player was not "standing" in the crease when the
goal went in. He was moving through that corner of it. He was not
interferring with the play. I say it was a goal.
HOCKEY!!!! -- GO GOPHERS!!!
kam
[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: - Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Mark Lewin
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:15 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: rules question
>
>
> How does that wording compare with the wording for offside?
> To be offside, a player must have both skates across the blue line.
> Does one skate in the crease constitute "standing in the crease"?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Benjamin J. Flickinger" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 11:08 PM
> Subject: Re: rules question
>
>
> > Rule 6-27-c
> > Unless the puck is in the goal crease, a player of the
> attacking team may
> > not stand on the goal crease line or in the goal crease, or
> hold the stick
> > in the goal crease area or skate through the goal crease while the
> attack-ing
> > team has possession of the puck. If the puck should enter the goal
> > while such conditions prevail, a goal shall not be allowed.
> >
> > A player of the attacking team may stand or stay in the crease when
> > the puck is in the crease or when the player has possession of the puck.
> > The provisions of this rule shall apply only while the goalkeeper is
> > inside the crease. If the goalkeeper is not in the crease, the rule
> becomes
> > inoperative.
> >
|
|
|