> 2. 2 violations were related to the 1993 Championship.  The NCAA
>    Executive Committee declared that they were of a nature such that
>    the 1993 Championship should not be vacated.
>
> I've left off lots of detail, but I think it addresses the question.
 
Were the two violations for use of ineligible players?  I recall one for
improper compensation of a player by USA Hockey (How the player didn't know
where that extra money in his bank account came from I still don't get, but
we've covered that...) but I can't remember what the other violation was.
 
This isn't intended to start a bunch of Maine bashing.  Now that everything
has been resolved, I'm just looking for a re-cap of why the Championship was
in question and what the NCAA reasoning was for not taking it away.
 
H
 
 
 
  \_  \_  \_     Howard M. Quimby                [log in to unmask]
  \_\_\_  \_     Natural Intelligence, Inc.      Tel (617) 876-7680 x1208
  \_ \__  \_     Cambridge, MA                   Fax (617) 492-7425
  \_  \_  \_
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.