HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dan Olsen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 27 Sep 1996 15:01:12 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (87 lines)
Classification:
Prologue:
Epilogue: Dan Olsen
Client Services Representative
East Fishkill, NY / Building 504 1J-29
Ph: 8-532-5259 / (914) 892-5259
FAX: 8-532-7588 / (914 )892-7588
Mail: IBMUSM00(DOLSEN) or
[log in to unmask]
 
Here's the complete listing for the ECAC coaches poll along with some
interesting information regarding last year's poll.
 
1996 ECAC PRESEASON COACHES POLL
 
1. Vermont (11) 143
2. Clarkson  128
3. Harvard (1) 116
4. St. Lawrence 107
5. Colgate   96
6. Cornell   85
7. RPI    67
8. Brown    62
9. Princeton   51
10. Dartmouth   37
11. Union    28
12. Yale    16
 
1995 ECAC PRESEASON POLL WITH 95-96 FINISH
 
1. Vermont(5)  134 1
2. Colgate(4)  130 5
3. Harvard(2)  123 6
4. Clarkson(1) 117 2
5. Rensellaer   83 7(tie)
6. Brown    76 7(tie)
7. SLU    67 3
8. Princeton   63 10
9. Cornell   61 4
10. Union    39 11
11. Dartmouth   20 9
12. Yale    20 12
 
 
Note the format of the poll.  No coach can vote for his team as the first place
team.  First place votes are in parentheses.  Teams receive 12 points for a
first place vote, 11 for second, etc.  Vermont finished with 143 points (a 2nd
place vote from UVM's coach).  Clarkson received at least 8 of the 11 remaining
second place votes.  Yale received just 16 votes, which means that at least 8
coaches picked the Bulldogs to finish last.
 
If anyone cares, I'll have to add my picks and 2 cents:
 
  Team   95 Poll 95-96 Finish 96 Poll
1. Vermont  1  1   1
2. Clarkson  4  2   2
3. SLU   7  3   4
4. Colgate  2  5   5
5. Harvard  3  6   3
6. Cornell  9  4   6
7. RPI   5  7   7
8. Brown  6  7   8
9. Dartmouth  11  9   10
10. Union  10  11   11
11. Princeton  8  10   9
12. Yale   12  12   12
 
Vermont still lacks depth, but they don't need it unless they get hurt with
Perrin, St. Louis, Thomas, and don't forget Ruid.  Clarkson is still solid with
White, Houle, Pagnutti, D. Murphy, and a good freshman class - backup
goaltending is untested.  SLU has all the talent that nobody knows about and a
strong presence with Owen between the pipes.  Maybe it's just against Clarkson,
but Colgate has the ability to be a championship team.  Harvard is overrated in
the coaches poll, but teams that suffer tragedies sometimes pull off amazing
feats.  The Big Red showed they have the ability to win the big game, but they
are inconsistent.  RPI (or is that Rensellaer) fans talked about a rebuilding
year last year and they did indeed rebuild but they still won't finish in the
top 4.  Brown should separate istelf from the bottom four teams, who will fight
for the final 2 playoff spots.  Yale and Princeton will be collecting the
poision ivy at the bottom (some drop for Princeton, which was an up and coming
program just two years ago).
 
Go Knights.  (Golden and Black) - Bring Army back to the ECAC.
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2