Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 23 Mar 1996 18:02:26 GMT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In article <[log in to unmask]>,
>
>The first two periods were not good for Clarkson. They made some
>huge mistakes on defense, allowing 3 point-blank shots on Dan Murphy,
>and didn't look like they would even make it a close game. But, the
>story was Murphy. The first group of saves he made kinda gave Clarkson
>a wake-up call. The Albany Times Union told of one of Murphy's
>point blank saves that led to a Clarkson rush, which led to JF Houle's
>quick wrister that scored the game's first goal. This set the tide.
>Murphy kept WMU out of the net, and Clarkson blew it open in the third
>period.
Murphy was definately the story of the game!! He kept CU in it
frustrated WM so much that penalties and sloppy play resulted in
the third. Its a shame CU let up with 33 secs left and didn't get
him the shutout.
As for pressure on Clarkson to do well, I think they already
proved they can play with HE or the western leagues. They are
7-3-1 outside the ECAC including a win over Maine and a tie at BU.
They are in the tourniment because they deserve it and the 6-1 win
last night proves it.
>
>Clarkson can NOT play that way against BU tonight. Those defensive
>mistakes will lead to Clarkson heading back to Potsdam for the
>spring.
I agree. BU will eat them up and spit em out if they don't tighten
up in there own zone.
Ken
[log in to unmask]
LETS GO TECH LETS GO TECH LETS GO TECH LETS GO TECH
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|