Even more interesting (looking at the numbers) is why SLU has so few PP
opportunities! 10 fewer than the nearest other team, and almost 20% less
than the league average! Does SLU tend to take a bunch of matching minors?
Any other ideas?
Steve G
-------------
Original Text
From [log in to unmask] (The College Hockey Discussion List), on
2/8/96 12:30 PM:
Current ECAC powerplay standings (league games only):
Cornell 28-91 30.8
St. Lawrence 21-77 27.3
Rensselaer 26-121 21.5
Clarkson 20-100 20.0
Harvard 19-99 19.2
Dartmouth 18-97 18.6
Brown 17-93 18.3
Colgate 17-103 16.5
Princeton 14-87 16.1
Yale 13-88 14.8
Union 12-87 13.8
Vermont 13-96 13.5
I know why Cornell's powerplay is #1 -- they are 200 times more
aggressive than they were under McCutcheon.
But why is UVM's so terrible? I would think that Perrin/St.Louis would
just clean up with so much empty ice.
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.