Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 6 Mar 1994 23:40:48 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The College Hockey Computer Rating
Includes games on 3/6/94. Last ranking includes games on 2/27/94.
Last Division I
Rank Rank Team Record Performance Schedule Rating
1 2 Boston University 26 7 1 55.88 2 11.02 13 66.91
2 1 Michigan 29 6 1 63.89 1 1.94 26 65.82
3 3 Colorado College 22 9 5 36.11 6 17.13 10 53.24
4 5 Wisconsin 22 13 1 25.00 11 25.25 5 50.25
5 4 Minnesota 20 12 4 22.22 15 24.77 6 46.99
6 7 Lake Superior 24 9 4 40.54 5 1.53 28 42.07
7 6 Northern Michigan 20 15 1 13.89 19 24.77 7 38.66
8 8 Harvard 19 4 4 55.56 3 -17.58 39 37.97
9 9 St Cloud 18 12 4 17.65 16 19.78 9 37.42
10 10 New Hampshire 20 12 2 23.53 14 10.81 14 34.34
11 11 Mass-Lowell 19 8 7 32.35 7 1.17 29 33.52
12 14 Michigan State 19 10 5 26.47 9 5.98 22 32.45
13 13 Western Michigan 20 11 3 26.47 9 1.75 27 28.22
14 12 Northeastern 17 11 6 17.65 16 10.51 15 28.16
15 15 Maine 17 13 4 11.76 21 15.23 11 26.99
16 16 Alaska-Anchorage 15 17 2 -5.88 27 27.07 3 21.18
17 17 Miami 18 14 1 12.12 20 5.30 23 17.42
18 18 Denver 15 18 3 -8.33 29 22.77 8 14.44
19 22 RPI 17 8 4 31.03 8 -17.46 38 13.58
20 19 Boston College 15 14 5 2.94 25 8.72 19 11.66
21 20 Minnesota-Duluth 14 19 3 -13.89 31 25.34 4 11.45
22 24 Clarkson 15 8 5 25.00 11 -15.30 34 9.70
23 23 Alaska-Fairbanks 18 11 0 24.14 13 -17.97 40 6.16
24 21 Bowling Green 16 16 2 0.00 26 3.68 24 3.68
25 26 North Dakota 11 21 4 -27.78 36 29.23 1 1.45
26 25 Brown 13 10 4 11.11 22 -16.51 37 -5.40
27 27 Vermont 13 10 6 10.34 23 -16.03 35 -5.68
28 30 Michigan Tech 10 24 5 -35.90 41 28.42 2 -7.47
29 28 Providence 11 19 3 -24.24 34 13.06 12 -11.18
30 29 Merrimack 11 18 2 -22.58 33 9.82 16 -12.76
31 33 Union 11 9 4 8.33 24 -23.65 43 -15.32
32 32 Ferris State 13 22 1 -25.00 35 9.32 18 -15.68
33 34 Notre Dame 10 20 5 -28.57 37 8.68 20 -19.89
34 31 Colgate 12 14 2 -7.14 28 -18.34 41 -25.48
35 35 Illinois-Chicago 9 25 2 -44.44 46 9.68 17 -34.76
36 39 Ohio State 6 19 5 -43.33 45 8.33 21 -35.00
37 37 Kent 10 24 2 -38.89 43 2.89 25 -36.00
38 38 Princeton 9 14 3 -19.23 32 -19.92 42 -39.15
39 36 Cornell 7 15 5 -29.63 38 -9.91 30 -39.54
40 40 St Lawrence 10 20 0 -33.33 39 -15.07 32 -48.41
41 41 Air Force 7 15 0 -36.36 42 -16.38 36 -52.74
42 42 Dartmouth 5 21 1 -59.26 49 -12.17 31 -71.43
43 43 Yale 5 21 1 -59.26 49 -15.20 33 -74.46
44 44 *Canisius 3 1 0 50.00 4 -138.78 48 -88.78
45 45 *Mass-Amherst 5 6 0 -9.09 30 -88.50 45 -97.59
46 46 Army 6 16 0 -45.45 47 -59.14 44 -104.59
47 47 *U Connecticut 2 4 0 -33.33 39 -113.69 46 -147.02
48 48 *Fairfield 3 2 1 16.67 18 -178.60 51 -161.93
49 49 *Villanova 2 5 0 -42.86 44 -145.92 50 -188.78
50 50 *Holy Cross 1 4 0 -60.00 51 -131.63 47 -191.63
51 51 *Iona 1 5 1 -57.14 48 -141.77 49 -198.91
PERFORMANCE is based on won-lost record only; game sites and margin of victory
are not considered, for example. Performance ranges from +100 (for an
undefeated and untied team) to -100 (for a winless and untied team), with
a .500 winning percentage getting a zero performance.
SCHEDULE is the average rating of a team's opponents.
RATING is the sum of performance and schedule and represents an evaluation of
how each team has done so far with respect to the rest of college hockey.
Based on 728 Division I games. Includes all Division I teams. * = not eligible
for the NCAA tournament
In accordance with NCAA statistical by-laws, the original results from Maine's
forfeited games are used.
Please note that TCHCR is not the same as the Rating Percentage Index used by
the NCAA Ice Hockey Selection Committee. But TCHCR will be treating the Maine
forfeits the same way for consistency.
|
|
|