Charles Sackett wrote:
>You make many very strong and valid points; however, if Wisconsin's defense
>is such a testament (or reason) to Elliott's play...then why did Connelly
>fare so poorly when he took over during Elliott's injury? I don't believe
>that he was even marginal.
>
>I agree...the defense is very strong....but if you have seen him as of late
>(returned to his previous form, might I add) it would be hard to argue that
>he has the ability to singlehandedly win a game. (As does David McKee,
>might I add.)
>
>
True, but the couple of times I saw Wisconsin while Elliott was out,
they weren't playing nearly as well.
--
J. Michael Neal
http://idonotlikeyoueither.blogspot.com/