HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
David Parter <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 25 Mar 2002 10:43:23 -0600
In-Reply-To:
Message from Erik Biever <[log in to unmask]> of "Mon, 25 Mar 2002 10:37:06 CST." <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
To: Erik Biever <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
David Parter <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
> Craig Powers writes:
>
> > A fourth idea, suggested by Jack McDonald of QU, is for the first round
> > to be played at the site of the better seed, followed (I presume) by
> > two regionals with two teams each advancing.
>
> That's appealing, but it would add an extra week to the tournament.  I doubt
> the NC$$ would approve it.

do you return to the best-of-three format for the first round, or play
just one game? Seems like a lot of travel for only one game if there are
east-west matchups in the first round (and west-west matchups too, but
we're used to it!)

    --david

ATOM RSS1 RSS2