HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Mark Lewin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 22:52:26 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Mark Lewin <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Now that Michigan has defeated St. Cloud, I have a question about the crease
violation
to negated St. Cloud's would be 3rd goal.

The way I saw the replay, the Huskies player had one skate in the crease
before the puck
entered the crease. The puck entered the crease and the player's second
skate went into the crease
before the puck entered the net.

The question is, what constitutes a crease violation. Is one skate in enough
or do both skates have to be
in before the puck enters the crease. If it's one, it was a good call. If
it's two, St. Cloud got screwed,
(not to mention getting cheated out of the power play when they scored 5 on
3)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2