HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Dave Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Dec 1994 10:24:56 EST
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>; from "[log in to unmask]" at Dec 13, 94 2:54 pm
Reply-To:
Dave Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
[log in to unmask] wrote:
[snipped]
>
> Mass Lowell's power play looked pretty decent, but BC's looked pretty
> pathetic, or so I thought. The announcers disagreed with me. Perhaps
> it was Mass Lowell's penalty killing, which also looked better. The
> lack of specialty team strength could be a major reason for BC's lack
> of success so far this year.
>
 
FWIW the Lowell penalty kill stats are second in Hockey East while their power
play was around 4th or 5th last I checked.  I don't have BC's stats, but BC's
poor showing on the power play could be at least partially attributable to
what seems like a strength for UML (despite the fact that they've used just
about every forward on the unit).
 
DaveH

ATOM RSS1 RSS2