Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 2 Dec 1995 04:23:03 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sat, 2 Dec 1995, Mike Machnik wrote:
> With BC leading 3-1 early in the second period and the teams skating 4x4, a
> delayed penalty was signaled against Lowell and BC goalie Greg Taylor
> headed to the bench for an extra attacker. At the same time, BC D Greg
> Callahan tried to collect the puck in the neutral zone while heading in the
> direction of his net, and he lost control of the puck. It slid down the
> ice towards the empty net, and although Callahan tried to reach it, he
> could not and wound up throwing his stick at the puck as it neared the net,
> to no avail.
>
> This could have been a penalty shot/optional minor, but as it was, the puck
> went in anyway. It seemed to me that according to the rules, Callahan
> could still have been assessed a minor for throwing the stick, but this did
> not happen.
This raises an interesting question. It is my understanding that, if a
delayed penalty is called against a penalty killer, the penalty
(if a minor) terminates AND the delayed penalty is nullified.
Does anyone know if two pending delayed penalties can be wiped out
by the same goal? (I'm assuming that the stick-throwing was not called,
so the game would not have provided the answer.)
Cheers,
Mike
+-----------------------------+----------------------------------------+
| Michael Patrick Bresina | America's always had a problem |
| [log in to unmask] | with illegal aliens. Ask any Indian. |
+-----------------------------+----------------------------------------+
"He sewed his eyes shut because he is afraid to see." -- Trent Reznor
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|