Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) |
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:27:40 -0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<000001c2dde8$20b1a760$6501a8c0@GATEWAY2002> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Actually, Cornell is 1-1 vs. Ohio State. Cornell won the first meeting
3-1 in november (at Ohio State), then lost at the Everblades holiday
tourney 1-0 in December.
Rita Monde
Trinity College 1991
Cornell University 2000.
On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 02:40 PM, Patrick Abegg wrote:
> A quick look on winners from this system:
>
> Cornell has 2 wins over BU
> Harvard has nothing
>
> Providence has 2 wins over MSU-Mankato
> Maine has win over Cornell
> BC has win over Denver
> UNH has a win and a tie with Minnesota
> BU has 2 wins over Harvard, 1 over BC and Michigan
>
> Denver has win over UNH
> CC has win over Maine
> Minnesota has win over BC and a tie with UNH
> St Cloud has 2 wins over Providence and a win over Ferris
> North Dakota has win over Michigan
> MSU-Mankato has nothing
>
> Ferris has win over SC
> Michigan has nothing
> Ohio St has win over Cornell
> Michigan St has nothing
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: - Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Erik J Biever
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 5:17 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: back to the smoke-filled room
>
> I expect that the "exact percentage bonus" won't be known until the
> committee knows which teams and/or conferences it wants to reward by
> applying it.
>
> Let me be the first to say that the WCHA didn't get enough respect from
> the committee.
>
> -- Erik
>
>> http://www.uscho.com/news/2003/02/26_006290.php
>>
>> "According to Division I men's ice hockey committee chair Ian McCaw, a
>> 'bonus component' will reward teams for 'good wins' by adding
>> percentage
>> points to their Ratings Percentage Index (RPI)."
>>
>> ...
>>
>> "Though the system remains objective because the bonus is precisely
>> defined the NCAA has not published the exact percentage bonus that
>> will
>> be given.
>>
>> 'This will add a little mystery to [selection] Sunday,' said McCaw."
>>
>> I guess the committee got tired of having all the selection criteria
>> available for examination by the public. Now we can go back to
>> grumbling
>> about how much respect our favorite conferences get from the
>> committee.
>>
>> -- Erik
>>
>>
Rita-Ann Monde, PhD
Institute of Molecular Biology
University of Oregon
1370 Franklin Boulevard
Eugene, OR 97403
Phone: 541-346-2546
Fax: 541-346-5891
|
|
|