HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wayne Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Wayne Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 9 Jan 1994 21:44:51 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Mr. Valente,
 
>Now I'm really confused. Wayne Smith has written that the Ferraros have
>registered for one course for the spring semester. I was under the
>impression that in order to play, a student-athlete must be a full-time
>student. I don't think full-time students at the University of Maine are
>allowed to take just one course per semester.
>
>It's obvious that in this affair academic concerns are secondary
>to hockey concerns. Now, is the primary business of the University
>of Maine education or hockey?
 
   What academic concern is raised?
 
   I consider this a slander of the reputation of the University of
   Maine and suggest you apologize via the HOCKEY-L list.
 
   My article to HOCKEY-L was quite specific and clear that the *NCAA*
   provides for Olympic athletes returning to play at their school, even
   if they take NO classes.  The NCAA and Maine treat participation in
   the Olympics an honour for the athlete, school, and country.
 
   Maybe you don't believe the policy is a good one or maybe you don't
   believe the source to be reliable, but that doesn't give you the
   right slander Maine with "obvious that in this affair academic
   concerns are secondary to hockey concerns".
 
 
Wayne T. Smith
Systems Group - CAPS              BITNET/CREN:  wts@maine
University of Maine System        internet:     [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2