Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 29 Nov 1995 13:51:24 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
<Pine.SOL.3.91.951129121801.845A-100000@plains> (message from
Eric J Burton on 29 Nov 1995 12:21:09 -0600) |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>>>>> " " == Eric J Burton <[log in to unmask]> writes:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 1995, John Haeussler wrote:
>> -- Minnesota is the best team Michigan has faced this season.
>> That said, the general consensus among the Michigan section was
>> that the Wolverines would win 7 of 10 if they played on a regular
>> basis.
I'd be interested in *why* you came to this conclusion!
> this is where I think you are wrong the gophers have beat
> the wolverines 2 games in a row and you have nothing to base this
> on.
First, that's two games in a row over a two year period. Last year's
results have no bearing in this discussion. His statement, which I
don't necessarily agree with, was about this year's versions of the
two teams.
I'm guessing he was basing it on total shots, or just a feeling on who
was carrying the play. But I didn't see the game, so I really don't
know who carried the play.
> The Wcha is pound per pound a better conference, I think this
> why you saw some many teams in the Playoffs from our Division.
Talk about having nothing on which to base a statement! Please, I'd
be very interested in your detailed analysis that proves that the wcha
is pound per pound (whatever the heck that means) a better conference
than the ccha.
Anxiously awaiting your further explanation,
-Alan Harder
[log in to unmask]
Go Blue!
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|