Arik Marks wrote:
>
> **OK, let's make it proportional representation - 8/58 is ~14%, so 1
> in 7 regionals can be on a big sheet. But what you leave out is that
> the western cluster of big sheets gives all western teams far more
> experience on those size sheets. There are what, 2-3 in the east?
> And is there anyone who would argue that it's easier to adjust up
> than adjust down in size of ice?
In Hockey East:
* New Hampshire is full Olympic at 200x100
* UMass is close at 200x95
* BU and Northeastern are upsized at 200x90 but it probably plays closer to
NHL size than Olympic size
* BC has a practically-NHL 200x87
I don't think anyone in the ECACHL or AHA is above 200x85, but I could be
wrong there.