Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:25:08 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I was thinking that, althought the odd number of teams will create some scheduling
problems, it will be good for the league to schedule more non-conference games.
Non-conference games against better teams, especially wins, will help the ECAC
when determining playoff eligible teams.
Bill K.
"John T. Whelan" wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Joseph LaCour wrote:
>
> > It looks more and more like we'll have an 11 team league for the near
> > future.
>
> > What I've read @ USCHO is that 5 teams will come to my barn in year 1 for a
> > two game set and I go to the other 5 teams' barns for a 2 game set. In year
> > 2 we reverse the process. I would imagine that CCT - SLU, RPI - Union would
> > still be home and home.
>
> The problem with that is that some teams would not end up with 10 home
> games and 10 away games. For example, if Clarkson plays SLU
> home-and-home, and two-game weekend series with 9 other teams, they
> end up with either 11 or 9 home games.
>
> John Whelan, Cornell '91
> [log in to unmask]
> http://www.amurgsval.org/joe/
>
> Enjoy the latest Hockey Geek tools at slack.net/hockey
|
|
|