Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 26 Feb 1998 16:39:09 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Feb 26, 16:06, Greg R. Berge wrote:
>The first tie-breaker has always* been h-2-h. League victories is also one
>of the criteria, but it is lower down the decision chain.
The ECAC doesn't use league victories at all at the Div. I level. Several of
the ECAC Div. III leagues use it, as do the ECAC women, but Div. I does not.
I think I've got the ECAC's three-or-more-team tiebreaker about as conclusive
as it's gonna get... watch this space for details...
--
Disclaimer -- Unless otherwise noted, all opinions expressed above are
strictly those of:
Bill Fenwick
Cornell '86 and '95 DJF 5/27/94
LET'S GO RED!! JCF 12/2/97
"It's time for Congress to act. The computers do not need a V-chip. The
Internet needs a chastity chip."
-- Representative James Traficant (D-Ohio), citing a report in which a woman
claimed to have gotten pregnant (yes, pregnant) through an E-mail exchange
with a lover 1500 miles away. Traficant went on to warn of the dangers
of "immaculate reception."
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|