Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 8 Nov 1996 10:23:02 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree with both the pro-Harry and anti-Harry (Ammian, of
course) posters. That is exactly the point about Harry -- he can be
very, very good or very, very bad. I thought his work in the national
championship game a couple of years ago was virtually flawless. I
have also seen many games which justify the negative views.
Inconsistent, then, is my word for Harry, although I want to credit him
with always having a sharp eye for the penalties that can cause serious
injury.
My candidate is (or is he a "was"?) Pierre Belanger: thinnest
skin, most rabbity ears, most vying for fans' attention, quirkiest
calls, Napoleonic poses while waiting to drop the puck, etc. Pierre
once called a penalty on Clarkson because the Pep Band played "Three
Blind Mice"!
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|