HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Fenwick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 15 Feb 2014 18:27:39 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Question for the combined wit and wisdom of HOCKEY-L:

I just looked over the slightly-refined tiebreaking system for the WCHA and
noticed a bit of an oddity.  The first tiebreaker is head-to-head record...
sort of:

(from http://www.wcha.com/men/standings.php)

"A) If two or more teams are tied, and all teams tied have played four
contests against one another, then the team with the most accumulated
points from these head to head contests will be granted the higher seed. "

I'm not mis-reading that, right?  Head-to-head would not apply, for
example, in a potential tie in the standings between Alaska-Anchorage and
Michigan Tech, because those two teams will have only played twice during
the regular season.  So we throw out AA's 1-0-1 record head-to-head and go
on to the next tiebreaker, which is league wins.

I suppose I can see their point.  Head-to-head could be seen as a little
unfair, since both games were at AA and MTU would never have gotten the
chance to show what they could have done on their home ice.
--
Bill Fenwick                                                 DJF   5/27/94
Cornell '86 and '95                                          JCF   12/2/97
LET'S GO RED!!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2