HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Eric J. Burton" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:55:17 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
I would be willing to be minus TECH that the ECAC teams would have trouble 
with those teams. ECAC is top heavy You have Yale and Union this year and 
then a very serious drop off after that.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Woodbury" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: ECAC does it again


> Except Michigan Tech. And maybe Bemidji and Mankato. And perhaps St. 
> Cloud and Anchorage. Other than that...
>
> On Mar 7, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Eric J. Burton wrote:
>
>>> Say what you may about the ECAC, one thing that is always true,  year 
>>> after,
>>> is that the ECAC is the most competitive (intra-league) from top  to 
>>> bottom.
>> As a WCHA fan, that statement is false... No league is as  competative 
>> top to bottom as the WCHA, where any team can win on  any night, most of 
>> the top ten Stenght of Schedule is made up of  WCHA teams...
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2