Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 12 Jun 1999 16:18:56 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I've said before that medical research is so ridiculous, that they should be
embarassed. Here is more from today's InfoBeat:
THE SCIENCE OF PENALTIES: Dr. John Walker, an emergency room
doctor who is part of the Texas Youth Commission, did a little
research into whether playing rough helps a team win the Stanley
Cup and he's found that it pays to be passive. Nine of the 10 NHL
champions between 1988-97 committed fewer penalties. From
1980-97, 13 of the 18 Cup winners were the teams that spent less
time in the penalty box. So far, this series is bucking the
trend. Buffalo won Game 1 despite having 10 penalties to Dallas'
four; the Stars won Game 2 despite having two more infractions
(6-4) than the Sabres. Walker's prepared his report for the 1998
Ice Hockey World Championship International Symposium on Medicine
and Science after noticing how many kids were being injured in
hockey games.
#1 -- playing rough and being in the penalty box are two different things.
#2 -- if you are in the penalty box more often, you lose more often. What
stupid aXXhole has to ask that question?
Nathan Eric Hampton
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|