Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 6 Mar 1997 12:39:38 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I don't think the ruling would be as Howie describes it.
Case 1: On even strength, A scores on delayed penalty.
Result: Penalty wiped (aside: does player get PIM?), even strength.
Effect: 1 infraction, 1 advantage: (extra skater).
Case 2: On powerplay, A scores on delayed penalty.
> > The second paragraph describes NCAA rules. Team on power play
> > scores while another delayed penalty is being called -->> delayed
> > penalty is put on the board and served in its entirety and the
> > man already in the box comes out.
> >
> > I still don't understand how it all works together when a penalty
> > shot also figures in, but I can at least clear up the one source
> > of confusion. I only know this because of a friendly argument a
> > few years back that caused us to do some research.
>
> My understanding of the rules is that the penalty shot would be assessed
> just like a timed penalty (i.e. in this scenario, the player in the box
> comes out and the non-offending team gets to take the penalty shot). The
> rules specify the handling of these situations generically, without
> referring specifically to a timed penalty.
> HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
> [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|