HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Machnik <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Feb 91 16:34:34 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (106 lines)
    Here's a chart that is similar to the one I did last year around this time.
    Some of the things the NCAA has put a lot of stock in, in past years, is
    record against top ~23 teams, top 14, and top 8.  I ranked the DivI
    teams by winning percentage in DivI games, then listed their records
    against the top 23, top 14, and top 8 (actually 9 since BU & UNH have same
    pct).  The top 23 was arrived at by taking all teams with a record at or
    above .500, and adding in the two independents with the best chance at
    getting a bid.  The chart is below; following that is my current guess
    at who will get the bids and where they will be seeded, with some comments.
 
2/25/91
 
No Team               Vs All Div I  Vs Top 23      Vs Top 14     Vs Top 8(9)
============================================================================
1  Lake Superior      31-3-4  .868  12-3-4  .737   6-3-2  .636    3-2-1 .583
2  Northern Michigan  29-5-4  .816   8-3-3  .679   5-3-2  .600    1-3-2 .333
3  Michigan           29-6-3  .803  12-5-2  .684   6-4-1  .591    3-3-1 .500
4  Maine              28-7-2  .784  14-6-1  .690  12-6-0  .667   10-5-0 .667
5  Minnesota          24-6-5  .757   7-3-3  .654   4-2-3  .611    1-2-2 .400
6  Boston College     27-9-0  .750  17-6-0  .739  14-4-0  .778   10-3-0 .769
7  Clarkson           20-7-2  .724  11-5-1  .676   3-4-1  .438    2-2-0 .500
8  Boston University  22-10-2 .676   9-9-2  .500   6-8-2  .438    3-8-1 .292
9  New Hampshire      22-10-2 .676   8-8-2  .500   4-8-2  .357    2-7-1 .250
10 Wisconsin          24-11-3 .671   7-9-2  .444   1-7-1  .167    0-7-1 .063
11 Providence         19-9-2  .667   9-7-2  .556   4-7-2  .385    3-7-2 .333
12 Cornell            15-8-3  .635   6-6-3  .500   3-2-1  .583    1-2-1 .375
13 Ferris State       21-12-5 .618   6-8-2  .438   2-5-1  .313    2-5-1 .313
14 St Lawrence        18-11-1 .617   7-10-0 .412   1-8-0  .111    1-4-0 .200
15 RPI                16-11-0 .593   5-11-0 .313   2-8-0  .200    1-4-0 .200
16 Colgate            15-10-4 .586   3-8-1  .292   3-5-0  .375    1-2-0 .333
17 North Dakota       21-15-2 .579   5-9-1  .367   3-9-1  .269    1-6-1 .188
18 Vermont            15-12-2 .552   5-11-0 .313   2-8-0  .200    0-5-0 .000
19 Western Michigan   19-16-3 .539   4-11-1 .281   2-10-1 .192    0-9-0 .000
20 Harvard            13-11-2 .538   6-7-2  .467   3-5-1  .389    1-4-0 .200
21 Michigan State     16-16-5 .500   5-11-4 .350   4-9-3  .344    3-6-3 .375
22 Alaska-Fairbanks   10-10-1 .500   2-6-0  .250   0-4-0  .000    0-0-0 .000
23 Alaska-Anchorage   12-14-4 .467   2-8-2  .250   0-4-2  .167    0-2-1 .167
============================================================================
 
    WEST                         EAST
    Lake Superior            1   Boston College
    Michigan                 2   Maine
    Northern Michigan        3   Clarkson
    Minnesota                4   Boston University
    Ferris State/Wisconsin   5   Providence/Cornell
    Alaska-Anchorage/        6   Cornell/UNH
    Alaska-Fairbanks
 
    WEST NOTES: LSSU easy as top seed...I picked Michigan as #2 over NMU
         because overall, vs 23, and vs 14 were pretty equal; Michigan
         was far better vs top 9 and was 8-1-1 vs common opponents while
         NMU was 8-2-0.  This could go either way and I don't expect the
         committee to shut two conferences out of home-ice berths, so
         NMU may actually get 2nd...NMU over Minnesota because of common
         opponents (24-2-2 to 21-4-3) and better overall record...Ferris-
         Wisconsin is a tough one; I lean towards Ferris because of their
         better top 14 & top 9 records (Wisconsin's are awful); no common
         opponents to look at...as for independent, it's too close to call;
         the teams have at least 2, maybe 3 games left between them and
         those may decide it.
 
    EAST NOTES: BC easy as top seed; both BC and Maine were far ahead of
         anyone else and BC was just ahead of Maine, plus BC's 2-1 season
         series lead.  I don't think that even if Maine beats BC in the
         playoffs (should they meet in the HE championship game) that it
         will be enough to beat them out for the top seed...Clarkson was
         strong against top 23 & top 14 and a little better against top 8,
         plus they beat BU and NH; BU had three times as many top 9 games,
         but they didn't win a significant percentage of them ...BU 2-0-1
         v. PC; BU ahead of Cornell because of 8-5-0 (.615) record against
         common opponents, Cornell 6-4-3 (.577)...PC over Cornell because
         of 7-3-0 v. common opp., Cornell 6-4-0.
 
    The EAST seedings are given in the case that Providence defeats UNH
    Friday night, and also because I think PC is rated just a little bit
    better than UNH at this point.  If UNH wins, then I give them the sixth
    seed (2-1-1 vs. PC) and bump Cornell up to 5th because vs. common opp.,
    Cornell was 10-3-1 (.750) while UNH was 9-4 (.692).
 
    At this point, Cornell gets the slight edge over both Wisconsin and Ferris.
 
    What kept some teams out:
 
    St Lawrence loses out to Cornell (0-2 head-to-head, worse v. top 14 & 9)
         and Ferris (also worse v. top 14 & 9).
    RPI loses out to SLU which didn't get in anyway.
    North Dakota did not do well against higher-ranked teams; almost beat out
         Wisconsin, as Wisconsin was 18-9-3 vs. common opp. and UND was
         18-10-2, but season series went to Wisconsin, 3-2 (deciding game
         was championship of Badger Showdown).
    Michigan State had .500 overall record.
    The others listed above weren't really serious contenders, as their
         numbers show.
 
    REMEMBER: since the tourney winners get automatic bids, if a team other
    than one mentioned above wins its tourney, that could confuse everything.
    I do not believe that any team other than the 15 listed under seedings
    above can make the NCAAs if it does not *win* its tournament (and get
    the automatic bid).
 
    Comments, questions, and criticism (constructive!) are, of course,
    welcome.
 
 
    - mike, guru east

ATOM RSS1 RSS2