HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andy Weise <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 20 Jan 2007 15:25:31 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (63 lines)
My apologies...

I thought it was hard to see any evidence of a high-stick because it seemed 
as if
the BC player missed hitting the puck completely. If he really did miss it, 
then the
goal should have counted....that's where I have a problem with Hansen's reason
for disallowing the goal.

-Andy



At 02:49 PM 1/20/2007 -0500, Dr. Bob Hamilton wrote:
>So, it seems a relevant question to Andy is did you see any evidence of a
>high stick.  For some reason, despite its being mentioned in the original
>post you did not address that issue in your post.  Bob Hamilton
>
>From: Andy Weise <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
>Date: Saturday, January 20, 2007 2:11 PM
>Subject: Re: BC Protests loss at UVM
>
>
> >I watched the replays on CSTV over & over and that clearly seemed like a
> >goal to me.
> >The BC  forward entering the crease (puck was already there, so that wasn't
> >an issue)
> >looked like he completely whiffed at the puck, shortly before the puck came
> >bouncing
> >into the crease and  through the legs of Vermont defenseman, inside the
> >left post and
> >over the line.
> >
> >This was simply a classic case as to why instant replay should be
>considered.
> >
> >-Andy
> >
> >
> >
> >At 11:04 AM 1/20/2007 -0500, =?utf-8?Q?Richard_Henry?= wrote:
> >>http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?
> >>AID=/20070120/SPORTS/701200316/1002&theme=
> >>
> >>Quting from link above:
> >>
> >>Then BC thought it had the tying goal at 15:06, a goal that Hansen finally
> >>deemed had been propelled over the line by illegal means, a call that
> >>prompted York to protest the game.
> >>
> >>"Scott Hansen explained to me was the goal judge told him it was a high
> >>stick," York said.
> >>
> >>York said Hansen said he didn't see it and that the puck had crossed the
> >>goal based on the goal judge's input.
> >>
> >>"Our protest is that, and (Hockey East commissioner Joe Bertagna) will
> >>take it under advisement, the goal judge is strictly there to tell the
> >>referee if the puck goes over the red line. That's his only job," York
> >>said. "It's not to call penalties, it's not to talk about high sticks.
> >

ATOM RSS1 RSS2