LISTSERV - HOCKEY-L Archives

HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	HOCKEY-L Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Parker's comments
From:	Rich Shelley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Rich Shelley <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Mon, 29 Mar 1999 22:23:49 -0500
Content-Type:	Text/Plain
Parts/Attachments:	Text/Plain (18 lines)

<"And BTW, BC didn't deserve to be three by the criteria. Maine would
have stayed three and BC been four. BC would have faced UNH in the
second round.">
 
Depends on the choice of criteria. By the numbers, Maine deserved #2
(and a bye), BC #3, and Clarkson #4. Maybe, after the last two
tournament showings, there'll be an addendum to the 'Clarkson rule' --
spot them a couple goals going in.
 
Rich (obvious HE fan) Shelley
 
 
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand."
                                                    --   Homer Simpson
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.MAINE.EDU