> Ben Flickinger wrote:
>
> > I am not saying that (although it would be nice), but I also think the WCHA
> > owes us more than what they're giving us right now, which is dead silence
> > since Tech decided to stay.
>
 
[reformated for clarity]
 
> And exactly what do you want the WCHA to say?
 
I agree with that.
 
>                                                We've gone over all the
> reasons why they aren't going to go ahead and invite you right now.
 
I think it is reasonable for the WCHA to talk with UNO, and I expect that
they will, probably at the coaches meetings this spring.
 
>                  What else do you want them to tell you?  Like it
> or not, UNO is only going to join the WCHA by following the same rules
> and procedures that everyone else has.
 
Unless the league changes the rules and procedures. They aren't set in
stone, but changing them is a delicate process. Maybe they will, maybe
they won't.
 
>                                         If UNO can't live with that,
> than by all means, join the CCHA.  I still think that that's not a
> bright move, but it's up to you guys.
 
But is isn't up to J. Michael Neal to tell you that on behalf of anyone
except himself.
 
I agree with the second half -- I think UNO should (and probably will)
end up in the WCHA.
 
I think this topic has been beaten to death. How long until the next
face off?
 
        --david
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.