HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Mar 1998 16:27:48 -0600
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (36 lines)
On Tue, 24 Mar 1998, Adam Wodon wrote:
 
> You're not going to see the MAAC get auto-bids unless the committee is
> expanded to 16 teams.
 
Isn't a conference guaranteed at least one automatic bid, after having
been in existence a certain amount of time?
 
> Jack McDonald (Quinnipiac AD) is pretty certain of this himself, and is
> sure to be lobbying to get the tournament expanded to 16 once the MAAC
> begins.
 
I would be surprised if the NC$$ expanded the tournament. Going to 16
teams would mean that just under 30% of teams would qualify. (16/54*)
 
That would seem to dilute the NC$$ tournament, and serve (in many ways)
to potentially de-emphasize the Conference tournaments. Part of what
makes the conference tournaments exciting is the fact that some of the
teams are fighting for berths. If the tournament is larger, that will not
be as true.
 
See you later,
John
 
*-That takes into account the three new D-I teams in the MAAC, but
assumes no other changes to D-I.
 
--
John Edwards - Carleton (ON) '96, Manitoba '00 - [log in to unmask]
                         Behold the power of cheese.
The opinions expressed are mine alone, because everybody else says I'm weird.
   NOTE: I reserve the right to forward any obnoxious and/or stupid mail.
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2