Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | John T. Whelan |
Date: | Sun, 16 Mar 1997 01:20:11 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Charlie Shub comes up with the following brackets:
>> New Hampshire cornell
>> Denver Miami
>> Clarkson North Dakota
>> BU Michigan
>> vermont Minnesota
>> colorado Michigan State
J. Michael Neal replies:
>I don't think that this is the format that the NCAA will come up with,
>but if it is, I would very strongly object as a Gopher fan. Minnesota
>finished far ahead of Miami in the PWR rankings (4th vs. 10th).
How about sending them to the East regional, as in my "plan
D"? I think Charlie's setup is "better" than mine, but the NC$$ will
probably avoid shuffling seeds, for reasons you indicate.
>If the NCAA puts that high a priority on avoiding
>conference match-ups, then something is wrong.
Ordinarily, I'd agree, but having rematches of two conference
championship games, each set up by the #3 seed in the region beating
the #6 seed, is pretty distasteful.
John Whelan, Cornell '91
<[log in to unmask]>
<http://www.cc.utah.edu/~jtw16960/jshock.html>
Cornell Men's Ice Hockey: Back-to-back ECAC and Ivy League Champions
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|