>Joe Davison wrote:
>> Bottom line, UVM did have at least one player using a stick that was not
>> in compliance. The penalty was called. A second player was called for
>> using a stick that was not able to be measured as it was smashed prior to
>> confiscation. In the end. with or with out the penalties, the game was
>> decided where it should be. On the ice
 
Was the stick smashed intentionally to avoid being checked?   If so, then
how are the rules handled - are they handled like DWI's - if you refuse to
take the test you are found automatically guilty   OR   are they handled
like Drugs - if you flush it down the toilet before the police/referee's
can get it (and there's no proof) you go free?
 
Just curious.....
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.