Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Arthur C. Mintz |
Date: | Mon, 9 Jan 1995 08:18:06 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>No one ever explicitly made that connection at the time, to my
>recollection. It makes sense to me, but does not change my long standing
>feeling that Decloe, BU, Abbott, and Crocker, for various reasons were
>all treated unjustly at the time. My other recollection concerning this
>sordid affair is that Ned Harkness caused the suspension and forfeitures
>by pursuing this issue. That was what caused me to respond to the Maine
>postings awhile back concerning their recent problems.
>
>Arthur Berman [log in to unmask]
Partially right. Cornell brought the issue up, because one of their
players, Peter Titanic, was in a similar situation to Decloe and had been
declared ineligible, and Cornell wanted his eligibility restored and was
using Decloe as a precedent. Harkness had nothing to do with it, since by
then he had been with the Detroit Red Wings for two years.
----------
Arthur C. Mintz [log in to unmask] (607) 255-1487
Operations Officer (Acting)
Cornell Information Technologies / Information Resources
"Luck is the residue of design." - Branch Rickey
|
|
|